MoJ electronic tagging project criticised by National Audit Office

Ministry did not do enough to establish the case for a major expansion of location monitoring using GPS, and bespoke requirements for new world-leading tags were “too ambitious”, says the spending watchdog

Posted 12 July 2017 at 8:36am by

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has so far failed to achieve value for money from its management of the new generation electronic monitoring programme, according to the latest report from the National Audit Office (NAO).

The Ministry pursued “an overly ambitious strategy which was not grounded in evidence, and failed to deliver against its vision”, says the official national public sector spending watchdog.

The good news is that it has learned from its previous failings, and has begun to make necessary improvements, but major risks remain in a service expected to cost £470m between 2017-18 and 2024-25.

In 2011, MoJ launched a programme to develop a new ‘world-leading’ ankle tag that combined radio frequency and GPS technology, says the NAO, setting out to procure the service using a new ‘tower’ delivery model, which incorporated contracts with four separate suppliers who would provide four different elements of the service, with their work pulled together by a contracted integrator.

But the NAO says the Ministry did not do enough to establish the case for a major expansion of location monitoring using GPS, and that its bespoke requirements for new world-leading tags proved too ambitious.

Furthermore, the planned timescale for the programme was unachievable, it claims, with MoJ initially allowing only 15 months after signing the contract for the tags in August 2012 to develop, test, manufacture and deploy the new tags.

Contracts, however, were not signed until July 2014 due to the discovery of overbilling by G4S and Serco, followed by two failed procurements for the tags. The Ministry has now appointed G4S as preferred bidder for the tags. Now, it expects the new tags to be deployed from the end of 2018, completing roll-out six months later. This represents a total delay to the programme of five years.

Worse, a full five years after kicking off, the programme has not delivered the intended benefits. The Ministry had expected the programme to reduce annual monitoring costs by at least 9% (£9m) and potentially up to 30% (£30 million). The Ministry has so far spent around £60m and remains reliant on the legacy services.

However, it has reported savings of 10.6% by negotiating with Capita, the new monitoring supplier, which has streamlined the existing operation over time.

The NAO finds that the Ministry adopted a new high-risk and unfamiliar approach to the procurement, and failed to manage the implications. Furthermore, the Ministry also failed to anticipate and resolve the implications of its delivery model, which led to disputes with Capita and other suppliers.

In addition, the report claims MoJ’s governance arrangements were weak, causing slow decision making and allowing internal disagreements to persist. External reviews noted a lack of accountability to Senior Responsible Owners and unhelpful disunity between operational, technical, commercial and programme staff. This was compounded by a lack of capacity and capability in the context of high competing demand from other projects.

Following internal and external reviews of the programme in 2015 and 2016, the Ministry has taken action to address many of the issues. This includes changing approach to buying available off-the-shelf tags and bringing the integration function back in house. Leadership is now more stable and cohesive.

In March 2017 the Infrastructure and Projects Authority assessed that the programme team had been reinvigorated following key staffing changes and that delivery confidence had improved. However significant risk remains.

NAO welcomes all this, but still says achieving an effective new monitoring service without relying on a contracted integrator will require the Ministry to be much more closely involved than before in integrating the end-to-end service. It will also have to build and sustain its technical and programme management capabilities to effectively perform this expanded role.

“The case for a huge expansion of electronic monitoring using GPS was unproven, but the Ministry of Justice pursued an overly ambitious and high-risk strategy anyway,” noted NAO head Amyas Morse.

“Ultimately, it has not delivered. After abandoning its original plans, the Ministry’s new service will now, ironically, be much closer to its existing one.

“Even if it launches in 2018, it will still be five years late. The Ministry has learnt costly lessons from its failings but significant risks still remain.”

The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government.